
That being said, I had forgotten how little story there actually is in 1984. The main character, Winston, actually does very little, and very little happens to him. The plot is remarkably uncomplicated, and there's not much character development. Even Winston himself isn't terribly fleshed out. He basically lives to give George Orwell a medium through which to describe the world he has imagined, and how it functions, and why it exists. The novel felt to me more like a thought experiment than a story. Orwell seemed quite eager to pull us out of the story in order to explain it all, from his lengthy academic (but linguistically interesting) appendix on Newspeak, to the long pamphlet on the history of Oceania that we readers get to read along with Winston, word for word.
I actually don't think I had realized this when I read the book back in high school. I remember being really engaged, all the way up to the end (which, spoiler alert!, is a very depressing ending). But this time around, I found myself fascinated for the first hundred pages, and then, to be perfectly honest, I got a little bored. I mean, it was still interesting. It's just that, for a novel, it was a bit didactic.
Still, it was fun to read again, and it still made me think, and I still think it's one of those books you should probably read at once in your lifetime.
I probably ought to read Brave New World now to round it all off, but I think I'm a little dystopia-ed out...
1 comment:
Agreed (didactic). I found the book too creepy the first time and just a bit long the second time. But, I liked it more than A Brave New World. I recommend Jennifer Government, for a dystopia of capitalism. Though why you'd want to read a book about something we already have the pleasure of living in is besides the point.
Post a Comment